Myofascial Trigger Point Therapy vs Massage Therapy
Myofascial Trigger Point Therapy
Traditional Massage
A therapist studies client’s history to evaluate and
deal with perpetuating factors
A therapist studies client’s history to
determine contraindications
Pain Pattern is used to determine which muscles
are most likely sending the pain pattern. In about
75% of the time these are some distance away
from where the pain is actually felt.
Pain Pattern drawing to determine where
to concentrate treatment.  This is usually
where the pain is felt.
Range of Motion Testing is performed to identify
muscles that are likely to contain trigger points.
Muscles with trigger points are usually less
flexible. The release of the trigger point allows
muscle to regain its flexibility
Range of Motion testing is rarely
performed
Postural Evaluation is used to determine which
muscles may be tight, causing poor posture. Poor
posture is known to perpetuate trigger points and
pain.
Postural Evaluation is rarely performed.
Specific evaluation of posture is not
generally emphasized in traditional
massage training.  It may be learned in
continuing education.
Treatment is performed in multiple positions with
the muscles on a slight stretch to aid in identifying
trigger points.
Client treated in prone (on the belly) &
supine (on the back).
Each person receives a Range of Motion
flexibility/stretching program.
Occasional stretches are given    
One of the main differences between Myofascial Trigger Point Therapy and Massage Therepy
is that trigger point therapy works to relieve pain where most types of massage bring
relaxation and reduce stress. The following table outlines these differences. It is provided by
Richard Finn, a Certified Myofascial Trigger Point Therapist with more then 20 years of
experience and a Director and Instructor at the Pittsburgh School of Pain Management.